49ers Homeless after 2008

[ninersrule]

If this move continues the 49ers will likley be homeless after 2008. San Francisco and their lease with the 49ers is up after 2008 however the 49ers plan to leave in 2012. So for the 4 years between 2008 and 2012 the 49ers might be homeless. Why would San Francisco want to renew the lease for just another four years. So John York might have shot himself in the foot here. Sell the team John.

[49ers1]

If this move continues the 49ers will likley be homeless after 2008. San Francisco and their lease with the 49ers is up after 2008 however the 49ers plan to leave in 2012. So for the 4 years between 2008 and 2012 the 49ers might be homeless. Why would San Francisco want to renew the lease for just another four years. So John York might have shot himself in the foot here. Sell the team John.
Why don't you leave the smart decisions up to the Dr.

[Eng74]

If this move continues the 49ers will likley be homeless after 2008. San Francisco and their lease with the 49ers is up after 2008 however the 49ers plan to leave in 2012. So for the 4 years between 2008 and 2012 the 49ers might be homeless. Why would San Francisco want to renew the lease for just another four years. So John York might have shot himself in the foot here. Sell the team John.

Yes he did and there are so many groups that want to lease the Stick like? and we can't forget?. The City of San Francisco is the ones who have shot their feet off all of the way. those 10 times a year that the 49ers are there the City of San Francisco makes a lot of money. When you think of the price for a beer there is tap or cap fee that gets paid to the city. Parking $25 X how many cars? Most of the money goes back into the parks and rec budget which helps out the whole city. They won't tell the people this. Just like the name rights the money that the city got for selling the name to Monster is for use at the Stick which in turn freed money up in the parks and rec budget for all of the other parks and rec projects in San Francisco. I am starting to belive that the Niners played the Santa Clara card (which we all new about when they did the new stadium talk this last spring/summer). I hope it works makes the city play ball with the Niners like they did with the Giants.

[Rocketknight73]

I got some room in my backyard for them. I'll have to move the dog and maybe some trash cans but they can play here. I scored lots of touchdowns in my backyard so I know there is room.:wub:

[acorns68]

In the lease there are extension opportunities.

[The Vin]

You can thank one man:

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y248/GambitMG/Niners/Newsome2.jpg

[Eric 80]

You can thank one man:

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y248/GambitMG/Niners/Newsome2.jpg
I don't know who that is.

[The Vin]

I don't know who that is.

It's the re-incarnation of Hitler. Also known as Gavin Newsome.

[The Vin]

If this move continues the 49ers will likley be homeless after 2008. San Francisco and their lease with the 49ers is up after 2008 however the 49ers plan to leave in 2012. So for the 4 years between 2008 and 2012 the 49ers might be homeless. Why would San Francisco want to renew the lease for just another four years. So John York might have shot himself in the foot here. Sell the team John.

Oh and uhhh...shot in the foot? It's a mere call to Stanford University, who would probably take us in for 2 years until the new stadium is built. Think about the added revenue they'd get, especially in a down year for the Stanford Cardinals football team.

[Eric 80]

They could also come down south for a few seasons. We'll give them back I swear.

[The Vin]

They could also come down south for a few seasons. We'll give them back I swear.

I'm not one that cares where they play as long as the organization and memories are in tact and embraced.

However, I'd prefer Santa Clara (the shorter Southern move) because it still gives me the oppurtunity to stay actively involved with the team, attend games, and watch practices. Something I wouldn't get the chance to do if they moved to L.A. Even though I consider L.A. my home away from home. :hyper:

[AlexSmith5rings]

I say we just get the stadium done in San Francisco and not worry about moving.

[DraconisRex]

If this move continues the 49ers will likley be homeless after 2008. San Francisco and their lease with the 49ers is up after 2008 however the 49ers plan to leave in 2012. So for the 4 years between 2008 and 2012 the 49ers might be homeless. Why would San Francisco want to renew the lease for just another four years. So John York might have shot himself in the foot here. Sell the team John.


What ever.

[ninersrule]

In the lease there are extension opportunities.

Yeah but the City would probably not want to negotiate an extension for just four years, knowing they were not going to re-negotiate after that which would put the Niners without a home.

[Fromthe3rdRow]

Yeah but the City would probably not want to negotiate an extension for just four years, knowing they were not going to re-negotiate after that which would put the Niners without a home.So instead of collecting all that money for four more years, income from Parking concessions, a piece of the stadium concessions, lease payments, stadium naming rights - they'd prefer to collect nothing? Nada? Zilch?

Jeeze I certainly hope SF city fathers are not that petty. Would they really do that to their constituents? Force them to accept fewer services? Make cut backs, lay off police officers, firemen, close parks and libraries - just to make a point with the Niners?

I certainly hope not.

[prospector]

Stanford Stadium, 2008-2012.

[Hopper15]

4 years in a college stadium would be embarrassing. I could see one or two years but not four.

[markiemarko]

Stanford Stadium, 2008-2012.
it only fits 35,00 people....beautiful stadium though..

[Giedi]

So instead of collecting all that money for four more years, income from Parking concessions, a piece of the stadium concessions, lease payments, stadium naming rights - they'd prefer to collect nothing? Nada? Zilch?

Jeeze I certainly hope SF city fathers are not that petty. Would they really do that to their constituents? Force them to accept fewer services? Make cut backs, lay off police officers, firemen, close parks and libraries - just to make a point with the Niners?

I certainly hope not.

My sentiments exactly and in addition, a poster here mentioned optional extension of lease rights. So I'm sure the 49ers will use it to their advantage after the lease does expire.

Giedi

[Monster49er]

If this move continues the 49ers will likley be homeless after 2008. San Francisco and their lease with the 49ers is up after 2008 however the 49ers plan to leave in 2012. So for the 4 years between 2008 and 2012 the 49ers might be homeless. Why would San Francisco want to renew the lease for just another four years. So John York might have shot himself in the foot here. Sell the team John.


The 49ers have 3 four year options so this is a dead subject.

[Eng74]

4 years in a college stadium would be embarrassing. I could see one or two years but not four.

The Jaguars have been in a college stadium since 1995. The AZ Cardnals were in one up to this season. If it is while the new stadium is built I do not think anyone would have a problem with that. We could always go across the bay, it's not like they have a pro football team anyway:falldownlaugh:

[9erMan]

The 49ers have 3 four year options so this is a dead subject.

Monster is right about the option to renew but I think it’s a 5 year option.

[LOS41510]

Spare change man??

Just stay at monster besides its like the party spot for the niners

LOS

:fishing: :sf49: :tiptoe:

[9erMan]

Spare change man??

Just stay at monster besides its like the party spot for the niners

LOS

:fishing: :sf49: :tiptoe:
Screw SF and the crappy stadium options they bring. Santa Clara will be a much better stadium.

[BillyBones]

I got some room in my backyard for them. I'll have to move the dog and maybe some trash cans but they can play here. I scored lots of touchdowns in my backyard so I know there is room.:wub:

LOL! - that's faithful!
rep

[BillyBones]

They could also come down south for a few seasons. We'll give them back I swear.
Yeah. Right. I've heard that old con before! :nonono:

[History Horn]

I say Santa Fe,that way they can keep the helmets the same.:dance2:

There are enough folks from California in Santa Fe to probably make it work.

Go Niners

[Giedi]

As for selling the team - how about to somebody with deep enough pockets where he can build a stadium on the loose change he has in his sofa. ;)

Giedi

[49ers1]

As for selling the team - how about to somebody with deep enough pockets where he can build a stadium on the loose change he has in his sofa. ;)

Giedi
You mean like Paul Allen who payed less out of his deeeep pockets than York plans to? Or the Giants and Jets combined, who are splitting the cost of their new stadium, yet are still receiving help from their city with the cost of infristructure...

[prospector]

it only fits 35,00 people....beautiful stadium though..


I've been out of the Bay Area for a while, did Stanfoo change stadiums? I remember the stadium as seating like 80-90,000, they held SB XIX there and the Niners played there after the Loma Prieta quake.

[photomonkey]

It's the re-incarnation of Hitler. Also known as Gavin Newsome.

You're just wrong - in so many ways.