PDA

View Full Version : Purdue Quarterbacks

Gof the Gij
10-28-2009, 04:24 AM
Here's a fun statistic:

What are the combined records of all Purdue quarterbacks currently on NFL rosters?

Drew Brees, New Orleans 6-0
Kyle Orton, Denver 6-0
Curtis Painter, Indianapolis 6-0

Obviously Brees and Orton get a little more playing time than Curtis Painter, but none of Purdue's recent NFL quarterbacks have tasted defeat yet this season.
Pizza
10-28-2009, 04:32 AM
I wish I could make the money Curtis Painter is making to watch Peyton Manning play football.
NinerCubBoiler
10-28-2009, 07:48 AM
Here's a fun statistic:

What are the combined records of all Purdue quarterbacks currently on NFL rosters?

Drew Brees, New Orleans 6-0
Kyle Orton, Denver 6-0
Curtis Painter, Indianapolis 6-0

Obviously Brees and Orton get a little more playing time than Curtis Painter, but none of Purdue's recent NFL quarterbacks have tasted defeat yet this season.

Purdue QBs are the best... I wished we would have drafted either Brees or Orton. Both would have been a steal in the 2nd and 3rd round.
game4u2play
10-28-2009, 08:58 AM
the only one who overcame the odds was brees, and frankly im not that high on orton he is just in a position of good coaching and phenomenal recievers! orton is over rated!
illinois9er
10-28-2009, 08:17 PM
the only one who overcame the odds was brees, and frankly im not that high on orton he is just in a position of good coaching and phenomenal recievers! orton is over rated!

Im yet to see where they have Orton rated very high in the first place lol. I agree though he has nice offensive weapons around him and their defense is keeping them around without him having to carry the team.
Tical
10-28-2009, 08:55 PM
the only one who overcame the odds was brees, and frankly im not that high on orton he is just in a position of good coaching and phenomenal recievers! orton is over rated!

Seriously?
korvac
10-28-2009, 08:59 PM
should be receiver, not plural
pogoowner
10-28-2009, 09:02 PM
Seriously?
Phenomenal may have been too strong a word, but Marshall and Royal are pretty darn good, Scheffler's a very solid receiving TE, and having Stokley and Gaffney as reserve receivers is definitely nice.
JaketheSnake
10-28-2009, 09:09 PM
Seriously?What's your argument? Marshall has been a Pro Bowler thus far, Royal was among the most successful rookie receivers of recent years, at a receiving standpoint Scheffler is very good, and Stokley ain't no joke.
SamuelAdams
10-28-2009, 09:43 PM
Orton is killing Marshall's fantasy value. I was spolied with Cutler targeting him 180 times in 2008.
pogoowner
10-28-2009, 09:54 PM
Orton is killing Marshall's fantasy value. I was spolied with Cutler targeting him 180 times in 2008.
Marshall's been doing fine since he's stopped his shenanigans and actually gotten involved in the offense.
SamuelAdams
10-28-2009, 09:55 PM
Marshall's been doing fine since he's stopped his shenanigans and actually gotten involved in the offense.

Orton is a checkdown QB. A good one, but the Broncos go 4 wide and run very basic routes. Slants, quick outs, hitches, drags, etc.
pogoowner
10-28-2009, 10:09 PM
Orton is a checkdown QB. A good one, but the Broncos go 4 wide and run very basic routes. Slants, quick outs, hitches, drags, etc.
What's your point? Marshall has been very productive, fantasy-wise.
RickyWatters
10-29-2009, 07:58 AM
Marshall's been doing fine since he's stopped his shenanigans and actually gotten involved in the offense.

I swear I will pistol whip the next person to say the word shenanigans
XJUN10RX
10-29-2009, 09:50 AM
Shenanigans I tell you