|
|
|
Top #1 |
|
NOW THATS OLD SCHOOL
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 29
Posts: 1,142
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
With the draft in the rear view mirror, half of the board is happy while the other half is less then pleased. But it is simple...its all a numbers game. We needed these guys. If you look at our team, we had NO depth at the O-Line, NONE! And now that Baas has a torn pec, what does this leave us? A converted former D-Line men turned O-line, or Wag, sure he has filled in nicely but for a full season? We lost two players guys with the loss of Smiley and the probable Allen. These players need to be replaced.
The same goes for the D-line, We lost the keystone to this team with BY and then lose Dougles to free agnecy. These players need to be replaced. And the team did that. Not to mention draft a player that will make the new leader of the defense...WILLIS, even better. We drafted the BPA that we had a need for, the fell to us and we wasted no time taking him. Now we look at the Wideouts. And lets face it, the team improved the talent with free agency. With the additon of Bruce and Johnson, who replace Djack and Gilmore. And yes these are upgrades. And lets not forget that we don't know what we have in Hill and the hopes that Martz system can use Lelie to his strong points of a deep threat. The current roster has more wideouts then we can carry for a season. This is not a pressing need. Granted I am not going to lie to you and say, I didn't want a Jackson or Sweed, because I would have loved them, but its not a need. Now we take the topic of Groves, once again I am not going to lie and say I didn't want him, but we have so many backers, We have TBC who is and will be a better situational pass rusher, Moore who is like Jason Hill in that we don't really know what we have, Parys and Oliver who has been solid, and not to mention Manny will be back. Groves just was not a need. Groves would have been a luxury. This draft was not sexy but did make this team better. Our team is right in the middle of the spectrum. We are in far better shape then the teams that have no talent, that can take anyone and it will improve their roster, and we are not the Pats that can just draft at will. Last edited by jrs4280; 04-27-2008 at 09:36 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Top #2 |
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,520
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Now we look at the Wideouts. And lets face it, the team improved the talent with free agency. With the additon of Bruce and Johnson, who replace Djack and Gilmore. And yes these are upgrades. And lets not forget that we don't know what we have in Hill and the hopes that Martz system can use Lelie to his strong points of a deep threat. The current roster has more wideouts then we can carry for a season. This is not a pressing need. Granted I am not going to lie to you and say, I didn't want a Jackson or Sweed, because I would have loved them, but its not a need.
Agreed. Bruce and Johnson are huge upgrades and the Niners can adress the WR position next year. If we would have drafted a LB or WR then our biggest weaknesses would still be there. O Line and D Line.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top #3 |
|
Working Miracles
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Can't you figure it out?
Posts: 4,192
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
you lost all credibility when you trotted out "Parys, and Harrison (???) " and for the LOL of all LOL's, "TBC who is and will be a better situational pass rusher". Pepsi Machine is a better situational pass rusher than TBC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top #6 |
|
Working Miracles
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Can't you figure it out?
Posts: 4,192
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yes, TBC is better in situational duty. that's like saying root canal is better in smaller doses. and herpes is better in small breakouts. just like slow, fat, disinterested, soft, one dimensional losers are better coming off the bench as opposed to playing the whole game. what's the next nugget - "gravity sucks"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top #7 | |
|
NOW THATS OLD SCHOOL
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 29
Posts: 1,142
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top #8 | |
|
The Genius
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Largo MD
Age: 34
Posts: 2,452
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top #10 | |
|
NOW THATS OLD SCHOOL
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 29
Posts: 1,142
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|